Which statement explains why the value of [2.4] is 2 but the value of [-2.4] is –3?
2 answers:
Answer:
A) Because 2 is the greatest integer not greater than 2.4 and –3 is the greatest integer not greater than –2.4
Step-by-step explanation:
For any x in Real numbers, [x] is the greatest possible integer smaller than x, or equal to x if x is an integer.
According to this,
<span>[2.4] is the greatest integer , smaller than or equal to (so non greater) 2.4. This number is 2
similarly, </span>[-2.4] is the greatest integer , smaller than or equal to (so non greater) -2.4. This number is -3.
Answer:
A) <span>Because 2 is the greatest integer not greater than 2.4 and –3 is the greatest integer not greater than –2.4. </span>
You might be interested in
Answer:
f(g (x))= 32x-18
g (f (x))=32x2+42
Step-by-step explanation:
f (g (x))= 4 (8x-6)+6
32x-24-6
32x-18
g (f (x))= 8(4x2+6)-6
32x2+48-6
32x2+42
C because its C your welcome
Answer: who knows what the answers is bruh
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
I would assume it's all but the second one (earned $60 over the summer=false)
C perpendicular bisector.
