The best thing that you should do in this scenario would be :
- Gather as much as information as you can regarding the issue (maybe by asking input from your associates)
- analyze the issue completely thoroughly
- Believe in yourself and create the best decision based on your analytic
hope this helps
Training is working hard and development is getting better
Answer:
Y=38.8
Y will increase by 38.8
Y=246+38.8
Y=284.8
Explanation:
Y=A. F(K, L)
Y=A. K^0.3, L^0.7
Then
Y=246
A=1
K=2000
N or L=100
Solutions
200=1(2000^0.3, 100^0.7)
Now the question says both k & N are increased by 0.20
Therefore
Y=1(2400^0.3, 120^0.7)
Y=1(10.3 + 28.5)
Y=38.8
Answer:C
Explanation: this quantity is allocatively inefficient because the marginal cost of producing the last lawnmower exceeds the marginal benefit to consumers.
Answer:
Under CAPM:
Re = Rf + Beta(Rm - Rf)
Rf = 5%
Rm - Rf = 6%
Beta = 1.25
Re = 5% + (1.25 x 6%) = 12.5%
Under dividend discount model:
Re = (Div₁ / P₀) + g
Div₁ = $1.20
P₀ = $35
g = 8%
Re = ($1.20 / $35) + 8% = 11.43%
Under bond yield plus risk premium approach:
Re = Pre-tax cost of debt + risk premium over its own debt
Pre-tax cost of debt = 7%
risk premium over its own debt = 4%
Re = 7% + 4% = 11%
The highest cost of equity results from the CAPM model and it is 12.5% while the lowest results from using the bond yield plus risk approach (11%), the difference is 1.5% between them.
