Answer:
yes that's the answer I hot
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be "near rivers or oceans" since people tend to inhabit these areas due to the resources they provide.</span></span>
The best answer in that set would seem to be "compromise." I'm not sure I'd use exactly that term, but it's the best term from the set of answers given. Count Camillo di Cavour was prime minister of the Kingdom of Sardinia, serving under King Victor Emmanuel II. This was a time in history (in the 19th century) when prime ministers were starting to exercise more control of policy than the kings themselves. It was also a time of something that came to be known a "Realpolitik" (a German term), or "realistic politics." So I'd say Cavour was a political realist who chose paths of action that would benefit his overall aims, whether or not they fit some specific ideology or master plan. I suppose "compromise" would be another way of saying that, but I'd prefer to say he practiced political realism.
Japanese Americans were placed in internment camps due to their ancestry.
<u>Answer:</u>
A clear separation between religion and government should continue to exist in the U.S.
<u>Explanation:</u>
- For a government to run the administration with no bias or hatred towards any element of the society, it is primarily necessary that the religion and state affairs are kept unmixed.
- It is so because the state is most vulnerable to come under the influence of the religion followed by the majority and make decisions that do not favor or deliberately cause harm to the minority.
- The optimism expressed in the given statement is thus philosophically and ethically correct.
