-36 because 64-100 (separate the terms)
7/30 pound of chicken. Since 7 is not divisible by 3, you will have to express 7/10 as 21/30 as 21 is divisible by 3.
21/30 divided by 3 people is 7/30
Thus each person gets 7/30 pounds of chicken
To evaluate the expression shown:
we begin by evaluating the numerator:
0.6+2.4(3-0.7×5/7)-7÷3 1/2
re-writing in proper fractions we get:
0.6+2.4(3-0.7×5/7)-7÷7/2
working out the parenthesis we get:
0.6+2.4(3-0.5)-7÷7/2
simplifying the above we get:
0.6+2.4(2.5)-7×2/7
=0.6+6-2
=4.6
working out the denominator we obtain:
5 1/4×4-(5.9-2.7÷9/11)×2 1/2
rewriting in proper fraction we get:
21/4×4-(5.9-2.7÷9/11)×5/2
working out the parenthesis:
21/4×4-(5.9-2.7×11/9)×5/2
=21-(5.9-3.3)×5/2
simplifying gives us:
21-(2.6×5/2)
=21-6.5
=14.5
thus putting back the expression we get:
4.6/14.5
=46/145
Answer:
-10 watches
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that she has a $1150savings, the shirts cost a total of $84 and the watches cost $99 each. let y be the number of watches she buys:
![99y+84=1150\\\\99y=1150-84\\\\99y=1066\\\\y=10.77](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=99y%2B84%3D1150%5C%5C%5C%5C99y%3D1150-84%5C%5C%5C%5C99y%3D1066%5C%5C%5C%5Cy%3D10.77)
Given watches cannot be sold in pieces, the maximum number of watches she can buy is 10
Answer:
124
Step-by-step explanation:
1234