In a series of Supreme Court rulings under Chief Justice Earl Warren, beginning with Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, "separate but equal" facilities were found to be unconstitutional because new research demonstrated that separating students by "race" was detrimental to them, even if facilities were equal.
<h3>Which Supreme Court decision caused the separate but equal concept to be abolished?</h3>
- The separate but equal theory was abolished as a result of the Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court ruling.
- The 1954 Supreme Court decision Brown v. Board of Education, which overturned the "separate but equal" principle and ordered an end to school segregation, is one of the most well-known decisions to come out of this time period.
- "Separate but equal" facilities were found to be unconstitutional in a series of Supreme Court decisions made under Chief Justice Earl Warren, starting with Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, because new research showed that dividing students by "race" was harmful to them even if facilities were equal.
- "Separate but equal" facilities were found to be unconstitutional in a series of Supreme Court decisions made under Chief Justice Earl Warren, starting with Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, because new research showed that dividing students by "race" was harmful to them even if facilities were equal.
To learn more about the Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court, refer to the following link:
brainly.com/question/9822748
#SPJ4
Answer:
complementarity
Explanation:
According to my research on different relationship aspects, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Alfredo was probably attracted to Belinda due to complementarity. This is when the personality or skills of one person, improve or emphasize the personality, skills, or defects of another person. Which seems to be the case in this situation since Alfredo is not good at certain things which Belinda makes up for with her skills.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
Option C: FILIBUSTERING
Explanation:
filibustering is simply an a formal and public act or way of preventing a bill to be voted on in the senate debate. It usually entails an active serving senator taking the floor for debate and talks as long as he can, for, as long as a senator has the floor, the bill in question cannot be voted on.
It is only used in the senate due to the fact that the senate does not share a time limit on how long the bill can be debated on.
It's an <span>undisciplined child.
Hope this helps !
Photon</span>
Answer:
I think it's enforcing laws
