Answer:
I hope this helped
Explanation:
This specific topic was the Articles of Confederation and its weaknesses. It lend itself well to a political cartoon because of the target it became because of its failures (I have used it for numerous topics in my history classes and just adjusted the rubric).
One way that US constitutional republic differs from historic monarchies is that the political authority in the US constitution is given to an elected president.
The monarchy is the ruling of a kingdom by a king, queen or a prince. The monarchs are usually chosen by inheritance. When one monarch die, the next in line to the throne inherits it.
This is unlike the case of the US constitution whereby the person who gets the authority is elected by popular vote by the electorates.
Read more on brainly.com/question/18468017?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
The major difference between these two systems is that in a Presidential system, the President is directly voted upon by the people. He is answerable to the voters rather than the legislature. While in a parliamentary system, the legislature holds supreme power.
Explanation:
<span>In the 1796 election, John Adams, the Federalist Party presidential candidate, received a majority of the electoral votes. However, the Federalist electors scattered their second votes, resulting in the Democratic-republican party presidential candidate, Thomas Jefferson, receiving the second highest number of electoral votes and thus being elected Vice President</span>
