Answer:
A, C, D
Step-by-step explanation:
All of the plot curves contain (0, -8) and (-2, 0)
B doe NOT contain (-3, 4), though the plot lines seem kind of fuzzy and other curves may miss, but not by much.
The 2 equations are
18.20x+19.50y=230.10
and
x+y=12
where x is the months of original cost and y is months for new cost. Since you know that you paid for one year (12 months) you can make the second equation. Then you want to substitute the first equations x by making the second equation
x=(12-y)
18.20(12-y)+19.50y=230.10
218.40-18.20y+19.50y=230.10
1.30y=11.70
y=9
so that means you had the original rate for 3 months and the new one for 9 months
<span>Let us start with the schnauzers, the easiest one to imagine. Let us assume that there were x number of schnauzers.
Scottie's are 3 more than schnauzers. So their number is x+3
Wire haired terriers are 5 less than twice the number of schnauzers.
So their number is 2x -5 (2x for twice the number of schnauzers)
Now add all these numbers.
That is x + x+3 + 2x-5 = 4x -2
The total number of dogs, 78, is given in the question
Now we know that 4x -2 =78
4x = 78 +2
= 80
Therefore x = 80/4
= 20.
So there were 20 schnauzers, 23 Scottie’s and 35 wire haired terriers</span>
Answer: 3^15
Step-by-step explanation:
Explained in attached picture. Hope you'll find it easy to understand. If not, you can comment :)
Answer:
The decision rule is
Fail to reject the null hypothesis
The conclusion is
There is no sufficient evidence to show that the designer's claim of a better shoe is supported by the trial results.
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The population mean is 
The sample size is n = 25
The sample mean is 
The standard deviation is 
Let assume the level of significance of this test is 
The null hypothesis is 
The alternative hypothesis is 
Generally the degree of freedom is mathematically represented as

=> 
=> 
Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

=> 
=> 
Generally from the student t distribution table the probability of obtaining
to the right of the curve at a degree of freedom of
is

From the value obtained we see that
hence
The decision rule is
Fail to reject the null hypothesis
The conclusion is
There is no sufficient evidence to show that the designer's claim of a better shoe is supported by the trial results.