Answer:
Jones may decide that the equity method would not be appropriate to account for the investment when Jones Company does not have significant influences over the management/operation of Sandridge Company.
Although an investors holding from 25% of investee is very much likely to have significant influences on the investee, this may not be true all over the times. For Jones, to prove that it does not have significant influences over Sandridge, there may be some following evidences:
+ Jones and Sandridge sign an agreement that Jones surrenders significant rights as a shareholder;
+ There is/are investor(s)/group(s) of investors who has more voting right than Jones and whose visionary/mission for Sandridge is opposite to Jones's.
+ Sandridge tries to reject Jones' influences on its management by seeking lawsuit or by successfully prevent representatives from Jones on its Board of Directors.
Explanation:
well if im right it should be 20$.
Exact interest method is using 365 days instead of 360.
We are going to use the formula: I = Prt, we will derived
the formula of rate.
r = I /Pt would be our formula, plugging in our amounts.
r = 93.37 / 2000 / (284/365)
= 93.37 / 2000 (0.7781)
= 93.37 / 1556.1643
= 0.06 or 6% when converted to percent.
To check:
I = Prt
= 2000 x 0.06 x 284/365
= 120 x 0.7781
= 93.37
Answer:
a) liabilities only
Explanation:
The journal entry to record the payroll tax expense is shown below:
Payroll tax expense A/c Dr
To Social security tax payable A/c
To Medicate tax payable A/c
To State Unemployment tax payable A/c
To Federal Unemployment tax payable A/c
(Being the payroll tax expense is recorded)
The payroll tax expense is shown on the debit side of the income statement whereas payroll tax payable is shown on the liabilities side of the balance sheet
