Answer:
Emergency fund.
Explanation:
Emergency funds are money that we keep on hand in case of unforeseen events. It may cover car repairs, unforeseen buying, medical bills and so on.
It is important to hold some emergency funds so as to avoid being stranded with no access touch needed resources.
Also emergency funds can be saved over time in case of job loss, having some back-up funds to use in the meantime will be a wise strategy.
Answer:
1.) The internal controls which were missing are from the separation of responsibilities. There must have been in place an inner regulator were an individual works with advisers while alternative individual or unit take-care of the expense procedure, then somebody else allow expenses and then office should distribute the expenditures. There is an absence of inner controls as you can realize that the corporation amalgamated with a larger corporation and no one measured other accounts such as Jackson and company any longer.
2.) With the lack of control, this offered Helen the chance to effect the fraud. With this presence said, she was talented to emulate sign receipts and spend the retailer’s expenditures. She were also the one in responsibility of office the initial and final of accounts. In short, she had several accountabilities that should have remained separated up better and had diverse individuals for the separations of the job. In addition, she needed a bank description from the corporation where she was capable to put the expenditures and pay individual expenditures.
3.) The method this fraud might be noticed is the inspection squad can ask the bank for reports. They might also conference sellers. The accounting section should have ended sure they were doing the due diligence in dealers and corresponding the receipts with statements and expenditures.
The link is very good to explain what you need but something it forgot was needing to know about foreign pathways
Answer is 2,000,000 . I need to add a little more sorry for this sentence
Answer:
Explanation:
If the government changes taxes without changing government spending to eliminate the recessionary gap, will the minimum required change in taxes be greater than, smaller than, or equal to the minimum required change in government spending?
The minimum required change in taxes will be greater than that of the minimum required change in government spending
tax multiplier (mpc/mps = 0/8/0.2=0.4) is smaller than the government spending multiplier (1/mps= 1/.2=5) because of the initial increase in disposable income caused by the decrease in income tax will be saved rather than spent
