Answer:
The employer will be held liable.
Explanation:
If the external agent brings harm or injury to a third party in the course of an employment, the employer is held liable. When a principal directs an agent to commit for a tort or if the principal is aware of the consequences of carrying the instructions of the agent could cause harm or injure the person, then the principal is liable.
It is called direct liability.
The liability for the intentional tort which is imputed to the principal when the agent acts to further the business of the principal.
The agent is personally liable under the following circumstances :
- Foreign principal
- Agent signs the contract in his own name
- Non-existent principal
- Principal cannot be sued:
- Undisclosed principal
Example :
A credit card company hires a sales person and offers a company van to make sales in that area. The sales person uses the office van to official purposes. But one night, he drove the car to a friend's party and while coming he drove over a pedestrian. In this case, the owner of the company will not be held liable as the sales person uses the company van for his personal use while going out for party with his friends. While causing the accident, the sales person was not not using the office van for official purposes and was not tendering official duties at that time.
Answer:
Maximum price to be paid for the stock = $12.43
Explanation:
The Dividend Valuation Model is a technique used to value the worth of an asset. According to this model, the worth of an asset is the sum of the present values of its future cash flows discounted at the required rate of return.
<em>Hence the value of the stock would be the present value of its future dividend discounted at 15%</em>
Year PV of dividend
1 8 ×1.15^(-1)
2 4 × 1.15^(-2)
3. 2 × 1.15^(-3)
4 2 × 1.15^(-4)
PV of dividend = (8 ×1.15^-1) + (4 × 1.15^-2) + (2 × 1.15^ -3) + (2× 1.15^-4) = 12.439
Maximum price to be paid for the stock = $12.43
Answer:
Answers below
Explanation:
a) Laureen's AGI - $45,000
For 2 daughter - AOTC is - (2000*2child)+(800*25%+2child)
=4000+400
=4400
For Ryan - 1900
AOTC - 6300
Laureen lifetime learning credit - Eligible is 2000 (The amount of the credit is 20 percent of the first $10,000 of qualified education expenses or a maximum of $2,000 per return)
so in above case it is - 1200*20% =240 (Since AGI is below clip of 56000 he can claim same)
=6300+240 = 6540 is eligible deduction
b)
Since AGI is 95000
AOTC can't be calimed if AGI is above 90000 and hence AOTC is zero and Lifetime learning credit can't be claimed if AGI is above 56000.. Hence it is zero education credit
c)
For Daughter it is same as a above i.e. 4,400
For Ryan it is = 2000+(10000*25%) or maximum 4000
=2000+2500 or 4000
so 4000 is allowed
so AOTC total of 8400 and LLC of 240 so claimed is 8640
Answer:
Answer is option b, i.e. Passion for his invention.
Explanation:
Roland has almost all the qualities of a successful entrepreneur which includes an innovative mindset, ability to identify new opportunities, but he lacks in being passionate about what he desires to achieve. To start something new and follow one's dream one has to be passionate enough to be consistent and patient. Passion without patience is merely a dream which cannot be realized in true form. Hence, instead of quitting on what Roland had started, he should have searched for some more ideas to influence various agriculture companies.
A. Women face wage discrimination and experience lower pay within similar professions compared to men.
