A. Age and Disability.
i think.
Answer:
C(100) = (75 x 100) + (200 x 100) = $27,500
Explanation:
the initial cost function of producing bikes is:
C(x) = 75F + 100W
the initial cost to produce 1 bike = $75 + $100 = $175
if the cost of wheels increase to $100 each, then the cost function is:
C(x) = 75F + 200W
in this case, there is not much to calculate since every bicycle must have 1 frame and 2 wheels, that means that in order to produce 100 bicycles you will necessarily need 100 frames and 200 wheels. Labor is not considered in this cost function, so any cost minimization strategy is limited to using the minimum amount of parts:
C(100) = (75 x 100) + (200 x 100) = $27,500
La respuesta correcta es Falso
Explicación:
El excedente de producción se refiere a la cantidad de dinero que obtiene un productor al producir y vender un producto. En este contexto, el excedente de producción puede ser calculado si al precio o valor de compra se resta el costo de oportunidad de producirlo (costo por producir un bien específico en vez de sus alternativas), así como otros costos de producción. De acuerdo a lo anterior la premisa es falsa porque el costo de oportunidad debe ser restado y no sumado al precio para saber cual fue la ganancia o excedente de producción.
Team
Please vote my answer branliest! Thanks.
Answer:
(29,800)
Explanation:
The computation of the financial advantage or disadvantage is shown below:
As we know that
Financial disadvantage = Cost of making - Cost of buying
where,
Cost of making is
= [(Direct material per unit + direct labor per unit + variable manufacturing overhead per unit) × units produced] + additional segment margin
= [($4.7 + $9.30 + $9.80 + $5.20) × 22,000 units] + $34,000
= ($29 × 22,000 units ) + $34,000
= $672,000
And, the Cost of buying is
= Units produced × offered price
= 22,000 units × $31.90
= $701,800
So,
Financial disadvantage is
= Cost of making - Cost of buying
= $672,000 - $701,800
= (29,800)
