Reducing the activation energy can increase the rate of a reaction. Reducing the activation energy would mean that less energy is required to process a reaction, whereas increasing activation energy would require more energy to process a reaction.
You can put wind energy propellers on the front of your car. This would be effective, as the high speed of the car would increase the rate of energy produced.
You could also have a metal rod slightly scraping the ground, and take the heat generated by friction to produce energy.
Hope this helps!
This was Lamarck's idea. Here's an example: Suppose giraffes originally had short necks that they stretched to reach high-up leaves in the trees. This continuous stretching of the neck was passed onto offspring, who as a result had slightly longer necks. This continued for multiple generations until we get today's long-necked giraffe. Lamarck was on to something (that something being evolution by natural selection, which Darwin discovered), but his theory wasn't completely correct since organisms can only pass on genes (segments of DNA that code for a characteristic or function) to their offspring. Since "stretching" would not code into DNA, it wouldn't be passed onto offspring, proving Lamarck's theory incorrect.
Answer:
O C. The population's growth rate is increasing exponentially
