Answer:
The answer is: $70,000
Explanation:
70% of the total damages equals $70,000 (70% x $100,000)
Comparative negligence refers to a legal defense used by the defendant to reduce the amount of damages that a plaintiff can recover. This is based on what percentage of the plaintiff's damages could be attributed to the plaintiff's own negligence.
Answer:
b. constant returns to scale because average total cost is constant as output rises.
Explanation:
The question has options. Below is the complete question.
<u>Complete Question</u>
In the long run a company that produces and sells kayaks incurs total costs of $15,000 when output is 30 kayaks and $20,000 when output is 40 kayaks. The kayak company exhibits
a. diseconomies of scale because total cost is rising as output rises.
b. constant returns to scale because average total cost is constant as output rises.
c. diseconomies of scale because average total cost is rising as output rises.
d. economies of scale because average total cost is falling as output rises.
The correct answer is explained below.
In the long run a company that produces and sells kayaks incurs total costs of $15,000 when output is 30 kayaks and $20,000 when output is 40 kayaks. The kayak company exhibits constant returns to scale because average total cost is constant as output rises.
The corridor is the vertical section of the supply curve of reserves in the federal fund market.
Answer:
A) Outsourcing
Explanation:
Outsourcing is sourcing labor and talent internationally rather than domestically.
Answer:$1,800
Explanation:
The first step is to calculate the amount of purchase price allocated to the stock and to the warrants. This allocation is made on the basis of the ratios of the relative fair market values of the stock and warrants over the total fair market value of stock and warrants. The combined fair market value is $60 ($50 stock + $10 warrants). The allocation is Warrants:$10/$60 × $108,000 = $18,000 Stock: $50/$60 × $108,000 = $90,000 The final step is to compute the gain or loss on the sale of warrants by comparing the purchase price allocated to the warrants with the selling price of the warrants. The selling price was $19,800 and the allocation of purchase price was $18,000; therefore, the gain on the sale of warrants was $1,800
