Bruno and the board of directors defend themselves in an action brought by shareholders for harming the corporation is The Business Judgment Rule.
Answer: Option C
<u>Explanation:</u><u> </u>
In the case that has been shown above is harming the board of the directors. They can protect them selves with the business judgement rule. In this rule, the managers or the directors of the business are protected who have a good image for the working of the company.
This rule does not take into consideration what the matter is but protects he directors and the managers, so they should use this rule to protect them selves and Bruno from the share holders.
They live on a narrow stretch of land between the Brazilian Highlands and the Atlantic Ocean. ^^
The taxes imposed by the Stamp Act led to revolts by the colonists who now sought to overthrow the British government. It sparked protests against the Stamp Act and riots. This event led to the American Revolution because soon these colonists would become Patriots and would go against the British in the Revolutionary War hoping to overthrow British rule.
The correct answer is B. Gatekeeping
Explanation:
Gatekeeping refers to the process in which information is summarized, filtered or reduced in a way is understood by a general audience usually because the information is published for the general public. This occurs in mass media as editors, reporters and almost all agents involved cannot include all the information and therefore need to decide on which information will be included and which would be excluded. This occurs in the case presented as all the media sources created a simplified version that can be understood by the general public rather than all the information and statistical data that would be too much to process for the public and too difficult for those without an academical background. Therefore in this case gatekeeping is occurring as information is reduced because it was going to be published for a broad audience.
Answer:
The way I see this is less a question on whether or not democracy is good, but whether it's within suitable boundaries to work correctly. The overarching state exists to keep a certain order, and, if someone is to see that status quo as bad, they often won't see a point to voting. If you agree don't think this, you should engage in discussion with them about the current status quo. If you do, you should try to find the least bad candidate if you choose to vote, while focusing on actions outside of a ballot.
