The statement that is NOT protocol if a parent feels an education record is inaccurate or misleading is: The school district can choose to disregard claims without merit.
What is protocol?
Protocol can be defined as a set of guideline or policy that is expected of a person or an individual to follow or abide by.
Since parents or students have the right to ask that a school correct education records in which they tend to believe to be inaccurate or misleading. The school district can choose to disregard claims without merit is NOT protocol if a parent feels an education record is inaccurate or misleading.
Learn more about protocol here:brainly.com/question/5660386
#SPJ1
Answer and Explanation:
Jusnaturalist School: According to this school, a law must, above all, directly address the promotion of justice in any type of situation, respecting the maximum natural right of the individual, which is an inalienable right that must be respected at any cost. . Based on this school, the situation shown in the question above is inadmissible, as it does not promote justice, it prevents innocent people from traveling via respecting their religion and still hurts their natural right.
Teleological School: This school has a strong political character and states that a law that achieves a social balance and promotes and is the service of protection and promotion of policies that protect society, it is valid. In relation to the case shown in the question above, this school can claim that the law is correct, since there have already been many cases of terrorism caused by Muslims, making their ban on boarding a promotion of social security.
2. When analyzing these two schools of legal thought in relation to the case shown in the question above, I came to the conclusion that the Jusnaturalist school is the one I most agree with. This is because prohibiting Muslim women from boarding an airplane because of terorist cases that they were not part of is a strong example of religious prejudice and intolerance, in addition to hurting the rights of innocent women.
The league of nations held a conference for disarmament. The members were Great Britain, France, Italy, and Japan.
To prevent future nation-state wars, moral disarmament intended to promote worldwide collaboration and understanding. The League of Nations conducted a disarmament conference in Geneva, Switzerland, to aid in the disarmament project. The Disarmament Conference aimed to ensure the independence of several nations while reducing a nation's arsenal of offensive weapons. Great Britain, France, Italy, and Japan were the first four permanent members of the League of Nations, and the Assembly also chose four non-permanent members for terms of three years.
In the 1920s, the League of Nations stopped minor wars and improved lives in little ways. But it was unable to uphold the Treaty of Versailles, secure disarmament, or convince strong nations to put an end to hostilities. In addition, as a global organization was established during the 1919 Paris Peace Conference. The League's objectives included disarmament, preventing war through global security, resolving international conflicts by diplomatic discussion, and enhancing human welfare.
Read more about the league of nations on:
brainly.com/question/15322225
#SPJ4
Answer:
a. Actual cause and proximate cause
Explanation:
Actual cause is the real cause of an event (i.e accident) while proximate cause is the reason that the law sees as the cause of the injury from the accident.
