B. using Jargon is not very practical as you don't know whether the audience understands the jargon.
C. This is useful- but not a method.
The best answer is A. - this way in fact does help the audience understand abstract concepts.
So they didnt turn on eachother and im pagan hellenic sooooooooo i know because of google
The option that identifies why Luke is told that he could not help analyze the results of the census in order to better understand the thinking and problems facing society is the following option: The census data does not address society's problems. Luke as a psychologist has the ability to analyze the different aspects of the human being in society, especially related to their behavior and ways of thinking. However, the results of the census contain data on the families' socioeconomic level, number of members, etc., but not issues related to thoughts or problems.
That would be Madrid.
Madrid's marathon is known as Maboma.
I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
