Answer:
1. Both were veterans of the War of 1812.
2. Both led US troops in Mexico.
3. Both ran for president of the United States as members of the Whig Party.
I don't know the rest sorry :(
Explanation:
- Winfield Scott was a general of the United States Army, diplomat and presidential candidate of his country. Nicknamed Old Fuss and Feathers, for his exaggerated adherence to regulations and his rigorous property in dressing, he served his country as a general for longer than any other character in US history and most historians describe him to the commander. most gifted of his time in America. In the course of his 50-year career he participated in the Anglo-American War of 1812, the American Intervention in Mexico, the Black Hawk War, the Seminole Wars and briefly in the American Civil War. He helped in the conception of the Anaconda Plan that would be used for the defeat of the Confederacy. He served as the Army's General Commander for twenty years, longer than any other in that position. National hero after the war with Mexico served as military governor of Mexico City. Such was his popularity that his party, the Whig, decided to nominate him instead of Millard Fillmore for the presidential election of 1852. Despite losing the election to the Democrat Franklin Pierce his popularity did not decrease, instead he was promoted to the rank of Lieutenant General becoming the first military since George Washington to hold the position.
- Zachary Taylor, also known as Old, Rough and Ready, was the twelfth president of the United States of America, from 1849 to 1850. He stood out for his great military career and for being the first president of the United States to take office without having been previously elected to no other public office. He was, in addition, the second president who died during the mandate. He died of gastroenteritis, although it is not excluded that it was cholera. Finally, it is also worth mentioning that he was the last president to own slaves during his presidency.
There is the bully. These people may be bullying the person right in front of them or behind their backs. They are the main abuser.
There is the one who is being bullied. These people are being picked on and abused. They do not fight back, if someone does fight back it's not necessarily bullying. They are the main victim.
There is the assister. These people don't start the bullying but they also bully the victim. They could encourage it or join it.
There are the reinforcements. They don't directly get involved with bullying, but are like an audience. They support the bully and cheer them on.
There are the outsiders. They stay away from the situation and do not defend the victim or support the bully.
There are the defenders. They come to the victim's defense and speak up for them, comfort them. They support the one who is being abused.
The answer you're looking for is C:)
I believe the answer is: diversity, ethnicity, and ethnocentrism
Ethnicity refers to the culture that people accustomed to when they grow up. Diversity refers to the social groups which members consist of groups with different ethnicities. Ethnocentrism refers to the act of judging other culture by using our own culture as a basis.
