Answer:
44,286
Step-by-step explanation:
The rule is multiplying by -3.
The sequence goes -3, 9, -27, 81, -243, 729, -2187, 6561, -19683, 59049
Add all of those up and you get 44,286
Given:
28/36 ratio
annual income: 86,250
28+36 = 64
28/64 * 86,250 = 0.4375 * 86,250 = 37,734.375
36/64 * 86,250 = 0.5625 * 86,250 = 48,515.625
28/36 ⇒ 37,734.375/48,515.625
Answer:
No, I do not agree with the conjecture because 1 is not a prime number.
Step-by-step explanation:
A prime number is one that can be divided by 1 and itself only. Thus it can be expressed in 2 factors only, 1 and the number itself.
Examples are; 2, 3, 5, 13, 19 , 23 etc.
So, 2 = 1 x 2
3 = 1 x 3
23 = 1 x 23
Prime numbers must be expressed as the product of 1 and the number.
The conjecture that every prime number can be expressed as the product of two prime numbers is false. Because 1 is not a prime number, since it has no 2 factors.
If you take 3.5 and divide it by 0.05, or times 20, that would make it 70.
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
1/4= 0.25
