If this is a true or false question then it’s true.
<em>Any</em><em> </em><em>two</em><em> </em><em>features </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>society </em><em>are</em><em>:</em><em> </em>
<em>1</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>Strong</em><em> </em><em>mutual </em><em>bond</em><em>.</em>
<em>2</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>Dynamic</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>progressive </em><em>.</em>
This most clearly illustrates
"Classical conditioning".
Classical conditioning hypothesis
includes taking in another conduct by means of the procedure of affiliation. In
basic terms, two stimuli are connected together to deliver a recently learned
reaction in a man or creature. There are three phases of Classical conditioning. At each stage
the stimulus and reactions are given unique terms.
I agree with these perspectives on the grounds that there are a few situations where an individual planned to follow up on a good aim however the result wasn't right and here and there an individual expect to act awful after something and the activity ended up being great. My point is that occasionally unexpected things can happen and cause a change to a condition that we have no power in. I trust that an individual ought to be judged in light of their expectations, not their activities.
B. The Europeans brought diseases like smallpox, and many Native Americans died.
