1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
klio [65]
3 years ago
10

Why did the indian rulers lose most of the battles of 18th century

History
1 answer:
ozzi3 years ago
3 0

The indian rulers lost most of the battles to the imperialsit British during the 18th century mainly becasue of lack of unity among them. There were several competing princes,some collaborating while others resisted. a classical examle can be seen in the Sepoy Mutiny whereby as many Indians who fought againts the British, as many also fought with the British.

You might be interested in
Colonel Benedict Arnold captured a supply of weapons for the colonies at:
fgiga [73]

Answer: Fort ticoronda D

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Where is the Mediterranean Sea?
ICE Princess25 [194]

Hope this help you!

The Mediterranean Sea is a sea connected to the Atlantic Ocean, surrounded by the Mediterranean Basin and almost completely enclosed by land: on the north by Southern Europe and Anatolia, on the south by North Africa and on the east by the Levant.

3 0
3 years ago
What is the effect of the supermacy clause in the constitution
svlad2 [7]

Answer:

The Constitution's Supremacy Clause prohibits state governments from passing laws that conflict with federal laws and also prohibits any entity from enforcing laws that conflict with the Constitution. This protects enumerated powers, which are federal government powers that are specifically set out in the Constitution.

3 0
2 years ago
The development of an atomic bomb by the Soviets in 1949 did all of the following except?
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]
Immediatly lead to a treaty that limited the number of nuclear weapons in the U.S. and the Soviet Union

6 0
3 years ago
What was the Nazi Soviet? why was the Nazi Soviet pact surprising?​
AVprozaik [17]

Answer:  officially known as the Treaty of Non-aggression between Germany and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, was a neutrality pact between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union signed in Moscow on 23 August 1939 by foreign ministers Joachim von Ribbentrop and Vyacheslav Molotov, respectively. it was suprising because the soviets were an allied power in ww2

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The nineteenth-century labor movement argued that: question 4 options: concentrated capital was not the enemy but that corrupt p
    15·1 answer
  • 2. What's the goal of production control agricultural government programs?
    12·2 answers
  • describe the two-state solution with respect to Isreal and palestine. what are the prospects for success?
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following accurately summarizes an idea of French Enlightenment philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau?
    13·2 answers
  • Minority groups rally behind what slogan
    10·2 answers
  • The first nine amendments to the constitution deal with
    13·1 answer
  • How much more could a textile worker make than a sharecropper? A great deal more, so only the head of the family had to work. A
    11·1 answer
  • The gulf of token resolution 1964 increased the power of the executive branch of government by?
    13·1 answer
  • What physical features would attract more people to East China?
    5·1 answer
  • A father shared a sum of money amongst his three sons Carl, Luke and Joe in the ratio of 4:2:3 respectively. If Carl received $2
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!