Nobody can help noway no how
To write an autobiography, you want to focus on the good, memorable moments, and how others influenced you to get you to the position you are in today. Therefore, all of the answers but the first and sixth are good answers to use in this scenario.
Starting from the very beginning makes a timeline out of it and doesn't allow the autobiography to focus on the development of your character.
Starting with present time and looking back shows the audience how you have used certain tactics to get where you are today and how you applied them to your character and strengthened it overall.
Including how important people influenced you is a great decision because ti is going to show the development and changes that you made and how these people helped shape you into the wonderful human being you are today.
Focusing on your point of view would be best because an autobiography is about you. Emphasizing other points of view would just allow the readers to infer certain opinions.
Writing about how you became stronger shows development in your personality and character and is a fantastic addition to your story.
Writing about funny moments wouldn't be the best choice because it emphasizes unimportant scenarios.
Overall, it is your story, so you can choose what you want to be in it!
The correct answer is C.
Freedom Rides were performed during the Civil Rights Movement and started in 1961, in the route Washington D.C.-New Orleans. Activists organized themselves to use interstate buses that communicated different Southern cities, in order to <u>check whether segregation had been abolished or not in public transport interstate facilities</u>, as the US Supreme Court decisions <em>Morgan v. Virginia</em> (1946) and <em>Boynton v. Virginia </em>(1960) had stated.
They could see in person how Southern states had ignored those decisions and how segregation continued ocurring.
A assimilation he is assumeing a name of another country to fi tin
Authoritarian socialism, or socialism from above,[1] is an economic and political system supporting some form of socialist economics while rejecting political liberalism. As a term, it represents a set of economic-political systems describing themselves as socialist and rejecting the liberal-democratic concepts of multi-party politics, freedom of assembly, habeas corpus and freedom of expression, whether due to fear of the counter-revolution or as a means to socialist ends. Several countries, most notably the Soviet Union, China and their allies, have been described by journalists and scholars as authoritarian socialist states.
