Answer:
Higgs's argument is stronger because Folsom's primary arguments involved quotes. Quotes can be unreliable, especially if chosen with bias from a selected group of people. Beyond that, quotes from people that lived in the moment are often short-sighted and don't understand long term effects. While Folsom does also source historians, he focuses a lot on Roosevelt's interest spending and believes that the money that went back to the American people actually prolonged suffering. Higgs, however, focuses on the short and long-term effects of the New Deal and uses a lot of data to prove his point. While he does have quotes, he doesn't rely on them to make or break his argument, unlike Folsom. Higgs is also able to understand some of the negatives of the New Deal, unlike Folsom who did not pay any attention to the other side of the issue.
Explanation:
This is for part two of the question.
Answer:
appeasement
Explanation:
brainliest plz
Hitler would just take countries and the ALLIES were fine with it until he invaded poland. They said it would cause war. So, Hitler invaded Poland and the UK and France declared war on Germany
The Hans dynasty retains centralized burueacracy and unified political system of the Quin but adopts and grafts upon this the Confucian view that government should be run by educated, ethnical men.
The US was the most productive country in the world. It produced many things and needed to sell them.
Answer:
Ottoman Empire and the Austro-Hungarian Empire are the two empires that split because of WW1
Explanation:
