What are the common characteristics of nucleated settlements

1 answer:

4 0

A nucleated village or clustered settlement is one of the main types of settlement pattern. It is one of the terms used by geographers and landscape historians to classify settlements.[1] It is most accurate with regard to planned settlements: its concept is one in which the houses, even most farmhouses within the entire associated area of land, such as a parish, cluster around a central church, which is close to the village green. Other focal points can be substituted depending on cultures and location, such as a commercial square, circus, crescent, a railway station, park or a sports stadium.

You might be interested in

If two cars get two a four way stop inter section which car has the right away?

Rudiy27

Let's call the cars car A and car B. If car A gets to the 4 way stop first, that car has right of way. If car B gets to 4 way stop first, that car has the right of way. If car A and car B get to the 4 way stop the same time, the car on the right has the right of way.

8 0

3 years ago

A generally accepted understanding of "comparative politics" is that it is a method of explaining similarities and differences b

ch4aika [34]

Answer:

Comparative politics is investigating internal processes within countries or political entities by comparing their characteristics according to a specific model. Though it can potentially address a wide range of aspects, comparative politics is most widely applied to such issues as politics of democratic and authoritarian states, political identity, regime change and democratization, voting behavior and a number of others.

Comparativists often ask how certain processes, for example, democratization, differ in specific states that still can be placed under the same analysis because they share certain characteristics.

Following the democratization example, let us take post-soviet countries. Comparativists may take most similar countries that share many similarities, such as Baltic states (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania), or most different countries, such as Estonia and Belarus. Here comparativists may ask, why Estonia developed a strong democratic regime, while Belarus fell into a consolidated authoritarian regime.

4 0

2 years ago

What was the goal of simon bolivar for latin america in the 19th century?

Allushta [10]

Bolivar stood apart from his class in ideas, values and vision. Who else would be found in the midst of a campaign swinging in a hammock, reading the French philosophers? His liberal education, wide reading, and travels in Europe had broadened his horizons and opened his mind to the political thinkers of France and Britain. He read deeply in the works of Hobbes and Spinoza, Holbach and Hume; and the thought of Montesquieu and Rousseau left its imprint firmly on him and gave him a life-long devotion to reason, freedom and progress. But he was not a slave of the Enlightenment. British political virtues also attracted him. In his Angostura Address (1819) he recommended the British constitution as 'the most worthy to serve as a model for those who desire to enjoy the rights of man and all political happiness compatible with our fragile nature'. But he also affirmed his conviction that American constitutions must conform to American traditions, beliefs and conditions.

His basic aim was liberty, which he described as "the only object worth the sacrifice of man's life'. For Bolivar liberty did not simply mean freedom from the absolutist state of the eighteenth century, as it did for the Enlightenment, but freedom from a colonial power, to be followed by true independence under a liberal constitution. And with liberty he wanted equality – that is, legal equality – for all men, whatever their class, creed or colour. In principle he was a democrat and he believed that governments should be responsible to the people. 'Only the majority is sovereign', he wrote; 'he who takes the place of the people is a tyrant and his power is usurpation'. But Bolivar was not so idealistic as to imagine that South America was ready for pure democracy, or that the law could annul the inequalities imposed by nature and society. He spent his whole political life developing and modifying his principles, seeking the elusive mean between democracy and authority. In Bolivar the realist and idealist dwelt in uneasy rivalry.

3 0

3 years ago

While testifying as an eyewitness to a burglary that occurred 11 months ago, Abraham was able to recall with great detail the cr

jenyasd209 [6]

Answer:

Craik and Lockhart would say that Abraham must ahve used the deep -or semantic- level of processing while encoding the event.

Explanation:

In 1972, Fergus I. M. Craik and Robert S. Lockhart identified the levels-of-processing effect that makes reference to the memory recall of stimuli in terms of the depth of a mental process.

There are two main levels of processing: shallow processing, which has to do with fragile memory, and deep processing, that involves a more durable memory trace.

Deep processing can occur when the person relates the object or situation to something else, when the meaning of something is thought of or when the person processes the importance of the object or situation. At the same time, deep processing can retain memories by repeting information, by analyzing it in a deeper way or by making distinctions between the items involved. All these elements would be present in Abraham's case.

7 0

3 years ago

Which of the following is NOT true of selective attention? 1. Selective attention is simply interviewers noting the topics to wh

guapka [62]

Answer:

1. Selective attention is simply interviewers noting the topics to which clients attend.

Explanation:

The phenomenon of the selective attention is the process of focusing on a particular a object in the environment and is over a certain period of time. And it also refers to the individual capacity to pay certain amounts of attention to the topics that one is attentive about.

8 0

3 years ago