1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]
3 years ago
15

What were some of the rights violated during Japanese Interment (United States)?

History
1 answer:
Agata [3.3K]3 years ago
5 0
Over the course of Japanese-American internment, a number of constitutional rights were violated by the United States government. While these abuses were never freely admitted by the United States, or the Supreme Court, on further analysis we can conclude that the rights to the freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, the right to assemble, and many others were violated ("Summary").

Religious rights at Japanese-American internment camps were one of the first victims of the human rights abuses. At the internment camps, the practice of the Shinto religion was outright outlawed, and Buddhism was severely restricted by the ban on Japanese written materials, which was necessary for worship ("Summary"). Overall, the practice of any Eastern religion was highly discouraged, and banned in the case of Shintoism. Denying these Japanese-Americans their right to worship the religion that their ancestors had done for thousands of years was a downright human rights disgrace. 

At the same time, the first Amendment to the United States Constitution was again violated, as Japanese-Americans were denied the guarantee of free speech while interned at the camps ("Summary"). Japanese-Americans were not allowed to speak Japanese while at public meetings, and public newspapers were not allowed to be printed in Japanese ("Summary").  In violation of the American right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances, there are many documented cases of Japanese-Americans being labeled as "troublemakers", and sent to isolation camps, who attempted to petition the government for redress ("Summary").  

Violating the fourth amendment to the United States Constitution, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), prior to Japanese-American internment, had systematically searched the houses of Japanese-Americans without search warrants, seeking any item whose origin was Japanese ("Summary"). In essence, the FBI was basing its searches of the houses of over 100,000 people on the basis of their national origin, and no evidence of disloyalty to the United States whatsoever. This was an obvious and blatant violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and a violation of the rights of Japanese-Americans. Simple and everyday items as common as short-wave radios that can be found in most American households were confiscated from Japanese-Americans ("Summary"). 

Perhaps the among the most grievous, the forced removal and subsequent detention of Japanese Americans resulted in the denial of witnesses in their favor, and the denial of assistance of counsel for their defense ("Summary"). Also, almost none of the 100,000 interned Japanese-Americans were given a speedy trial or access to any legal representative whatsoever upon accusations of their disloyalty to the United States ("Summary"). Finally, almost none of the Japanese-Americans were told of the crime that they had committed against the United States, as most of them had committed none ("Summary"). The 5th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was grievously violated, and Japanese-American rights were vehemently denied. 

The "assembly centers" and "detention camps" that Japanese-Americans lived in during their internment were grossly inadequate for their conditions, and completely insufficient to what they deserved ("Summary"). The hospitals in the internment camps were understaffed, medical care poor and food was dietetically deficient ("Summary"). Each of these circumstances can qualify as cruel and unusual punishments for the Japanese-Americans, a violation of the 8th Amendment. A large number of the Japanese-Americans interned were citizens of the United States. As citizens of the United States of voting age, it was their constitutional right under the 15th amendment to vote regardless of their race, color, or previous condition of servitude ("The Bill"). However, in the case of Japanese-American internment, the right to vote in public elections was denied, as the Japanese-Americans were prohibited from returning home to vote at their place of residence ("Summary"). Finally, in violation of Constitutional Amendment XIV, the equal protection of Japanese-Americans was violated because the government acted “solely on the basis of race and national ancestry” when identifying persons to be excluded from designated “military areas” along the West Coast states ("Summary'). The Japanese-Americans were deprived of their liberty when they were forcefully taken from their homes and placed in internment camps full of armed guards, weaponry, and hostile soldiers. 


You might be interested in
Three of the following were immediate results of the French Revolution. Which was NOT?
riadik2000 [5.3K]
Out of the following statements, the one that was not an immediate result of the middle class increased its influenced in France. 
4 0
3 years ago
Who ran for President in 1876? What were their political parties?
OverLord2011 [107]

Answer:

It was republican Rutherford B. Hayes and democrat Samuel J. Tilden

Hope this helps :)

4 0
3 years ago
What was the debate between federalists and anti federalists?
frutty [35]

Answer:

The debates between federalists and anti-federalists were typically about the strength of the Federal government.

The argued that the (anti-federalist) gave to much power to the federal government, and at this was taking a lot of power from the other states and I believe also the local governments.

<u>PLEASE MARK BRAINLIEST</u>

7 0
2 years ago
Which of the following was an effect of the growth of the service industry in the late 1800s?
Volgvan
<span>The question is asking us to say which of the following was an effect of the growth of the service industry in the late 1800s Unfortunately, the options are missing. However, we can still say some things about the service industry - 1) it had to do with industralisation, which meat an increase in pollution and also worsening of labour conditions for many people and 2) many people had access to services previously unavailable, such as travelling</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In 2007 north korea ranked last in the economic freedom rankings. north korea is a ________________ economy.
Liono4ka [1.6K]
Communist economy......<span />
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Congress holds the power to declare war, but in the wars with Korea, Vietnam, and both wars with Iraq, how have the presidents a
    13·1 answer
  • What was the reign of terror in France
    5·2 answers
  • The "Double V" campaign meant victory
    10·1 answer
  • Please help!!
    14·2 answers
  • Which of these is the MOST ACCURATE explanation as to how the Bubonic Plague was spread?
    6·1 answer
  • What document was one of the first expressions of self government in america
    14·1 answer
  • What caused WW1 make a claim on what the most important factor was in the start of the war
    15·1 answer
  • Which statement best summarizes the Vietnamese resistance to French authority in Indochina during the 19th century?
    11·1 answer
  • I need help with this when i do the other 15 questions.
    8·1 answer
  • Describe the journey of Magellan‘a crew to circumnavigate the world
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!