There were various effects of the Civil War but one thing that was not an effect was Reduced rate of industrial production in the north.
<h3>How did the Civil War benefit the North?</h3>
The North benefitted from the Civil War because the Civil War was rarely fought on Northern soil which meant that their industries were not destroyed or damaged by war.
In fact, the North was able to increase industrial production to be able to provide their soldiers with more weapons and provisions to fight the war, thereby increasing industrial production.
Options for this question include:
- Reduced rate of industrial production in the north
- Increased rate of industrial production in the north
- Massive destruction of Southern infrastructure
Find out more on the effects of the Civil War at brainly.com/question/11470945
#SPJ1
Answer:
The Jews forcefully invaded Palestine. It all happened in 1967. When Palestine was formed in 1948.
you may add something as " Free Palestine " as you wish.
Answer: A. United League, GMD, CCP
Explanation:
Tongmenghui or The United League in English was founded in 1905 by Sun Yat-sen and others as a result of a merger between different Chinese revolutionary groups and was formed with the aim of ending the Chinese Empire and initiating a republican government that would be fairer on its people.
The Guomindang (GMD) or Kuomintang as it is popularly known, was the successor to the United League and was originally founded in 1912 by Sun Yat-sen but was dissolved the following year before being reformed in 1919. After being expelled from mainland China in 1949, they took over Taiwan and governed it as a single party state until 1986. They remain a strong opposition party there today.
The CCP or the Chinese Communist Party is the current governing and only main party in the People's Republic of China. Founded in 1921 by Chen Duxiu and Li Dazhao, they endured several hardships under the GMD but under the leadership of Mao Zedong finally won the Chinese Civil War in 1949 and expelled the GMD from mainland China.
Answer:
Sure, the liberty to use arms
Explanation:
In declaration of bill of rights, 1689, was permitted to use of arms, to protestant sudites, therefore, wouldn't be correct to have a world where the people lives scarred and to use of guns is permitted, certainly, anything would be more a motivate to take a life.
