Answer:
Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.Explanation:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Yes, rapid change now outpacing the capability of governments to manage the global economy.
In modern-day societies, rapid changes are demanding almost immediate reactions on the part of governments. However, the reaction capacity of governments is too slow in comparison to the velocity of changes and the frequency of change. Practically, no government office or department is ready to face the changes in technology, modern society demands, trade issues, and economic transition like the one we are facing right now.
One simple example could be the pandemic. No single government saw it coming and most of them faced or are facing serious problems due to the lack of health systems that could attend the pandemic. Indeed, public health systems in most countries were passed by far, creating a complex public health issue.
Both example one and two are civil cases. Civil cases are those that involve contracts and/or wrongful or negligent acts resulting in the private wrong, damage, or injury of someone or something.
State court has original jurisdiction over both examples due to both dealing with local citizens. If appealed, both cases may go before the federal court due to the question of infringement on constitutional rights in each example.
Answer:
The census played a crucial role in the administration of the peoples of an expanding Roman Empire, and was used to determine taxes. It provided a register of citizens and their property from which their duties and privileges could be listed
Answer:
thats to big but Isnt it when u chew something it consumptions in?
Explanation:
