Answer:
A Type I error would occur if there was no evidence of an improvement on the national exam but there really was improvement.
Step-by-step explanation:
A type 1 error simply occurs when we incorrectly reject a true null hypothesis. In the scenario above, An experiment was conducted in other it know if there is sufficient evidence to support a claim that a new teaching method developed improves students score. If this claim is actually true in the real sense. However, after conducting a statistical test, we conuded that there was no sufficient evidence to support her claim of improvement using the new method, hence, the claim was rejected. By rejecting the claim, a true null has been rejected. Hence, a type 1 error has been committed.
Answer:
40 14/25 years
Step-by-step explanation:
Well, this certainly is fun.
First, to find the fraction of the doctor's life which 13 years represents, subtract the fractions from 1 (and in this case l stands for lifetime):
So, multiply this equation by the reciprocal of 25/78 to isolate one of l:
years
1) idk I got none of your options
2)p=42,000÷(1+0.0225÷12)^(12×5)
P=37,535.04
3)PVAO=4900*12[(1/0.029)-(1/0.029*(1+0.029)^10]=504145.41..compare with 500000
So the answer is D
4)lucas
90×87.92=7,912.8
((8,476.20−7,912.8)
÷7,912.8)×100=7.1%
Peton
55×72.03=3,961.65
((4,192.10−3,961.65)
÷3,961.65)×100=5.8%
So the answer is D
So first you need to turn the percent into a decimal. So 23% would be 0.23 because you divide 23 by 100 to turn it into a decimal. Now you multiply 0.32 and 256. So:
So your answer would be 23% of 256 is 58.88. I hope this helps! =)
