<u>Explanation:</u>
1. As in the case of Certain-Tees, Inc., their approach follows The Fairness or Justice ethical framework. This ethical framework involves the basic belief that everyone or everything should be treated or done fairly.
2. As in the case of Sahara, Inc., and Perfect Paper executives, their approach follows the Utilitarian ethical framework. Which is the belief in doing what brings the greatest or most good to the majority.
3. As in the case of Positron Auto Parts, their approach follows The Common Good ethical framework, which relies heavily on cultural aspects to define ethical practices.
Chill/Sleep mode... I think errr
Answer:
1. $100,000 and 25%
2. $137,200 and 34.3%
3. $150,000 and 27%
Explanation:
1. It does not expand
a. Net income= $100,000 (as given in the question)
b. Return on equity= (net income)/(shareholder’s equity)
Shareholder’s equity= $400,000
Thus return on equity= 100000/400000 = 0.25 or 25%
2. It expands and issue $160,000 in debt
a. Net income= $100000 + 50000 – 12800 (debt interest 8% of $160000)
= $137,200
b. Return on equity= (net income)/(shareholder’s equity)
= 137200/400000
=0.343 or 34.3%
3. It expands and raises equity of $160000
a. Net Income= $100000 + 50000
= $150000
b. Return on equity= (net income)/(shareholder’s equity)
= 150000/(400000 + 160000)
Where ($560,000) 400000 + 160000 is shareholder’s equity
= 0.27 or 27%
Answer:
$35,860
Explanation:
The computation of the ending inventory using the retail inventory method is shown below
Particulars Cost Retail
Opening Inventory(A) $63,800 $128,400
Purchases(B) $115,060 $196,800
Goods available
C=(A-B) $178,860 $325,200
Cost ratio
($178,860 ÷ $325,200 × 100) 55%
Sales at retail (D) $260,000
End, Inventory at Retail $65,200
($325,200 - $260,000)
End, Inventory at Cost $35,860
($65,200 × 55%)
Your answer is A. Paul is correct because the government always withholds money for taxes due from all incomes.
