It's definitely not in a theocracy: those usually favour the majorities.
Also migrant labors don't specifically favour minorities.
Now, between democracies and command economies the choice is very hard, as it depends more on the specific country. So for example in many places the role of the minorities rose in command economies, since they went against the patriarchy (in China this was the case for example, the role of women in China improved drastically, while women and minorities are still struggling in Japan, which is a democracy). On the other hand, Nazi Germany was also a command economy, and yet it was very bad for minorities
I would say that the question is too complex to give just one answer, but I would also argue for option d)
Answer:
B or C
Explanation:
The Mali Empire arose with the consolidation of several small Malinké Kingdoms in Ghana around the areas of the upper Niger River [v]. Most of what is known about the Empire of Mali's early history was collected by Arabic scholars in the 1300s and 1400s
Answer:
The Spanish colonized some of the islands in the Caribbean and all of what is now known as Latin America. The main religion in Spain is Roman Catholicism, meaning that when the Spanish came, they spread their culture (religion, language, architecture,etc.). Also the Spanish reduced a lot of what the native indigenous tribes have created.
Explanation:
Here's link to the answer:
shorturl.at/ipxUY
They both were alike concerning finances - both wanted govt to finance improvements to run country
Both believed this could be achieved through a representative democracy
Wanted the best for the nation. (They wanted it to prosper and be strong)
Both were American Political parties
Both were a force in 1786 & 1800
They were more different then alike by far.
Hoped this helped.
