This is how you know i’m def gonna fail my university class this year :/
Digital vs Analog Audio is completely personal preference and there is no clear winner on which is better.
But there are some pros and cons about both, Analog sometimes distorts when playing and can be easily scratched and ruins the grooves. Analog is believed to be the true representation of the sound when it was recorded. Digital is not the actual recording of the sound, it's actually a combination of binary code. It is also sometimes mixed or remastered in Digital and sounds a bit different to make it sound better. It also depends on the system you are listening it from. You could have a horrible Digital system its playing through and an amazing Analog system playing, of course the Analog system will sound better in that case. Some believe that Digital is on par to overtake Analog in the "true picture of sound" category but some also say Analog will forever be the best at playing sound and Digital will always be the alternative.
But, in the end it's all personal preference and the pros and cons don't overweigh to make one better than the other.
This is the quote of T.S. Eilot
what the answer to this question....
Answer:
competitive
Explanation:
An inhibitor is a substance that hinders the action of an enzyme. An inhibitor may be competitive or non competitive.
A competitive inhibitor is an inhibitor that is very similar to the substrate hence it binds to the enzyme instead of the substrate. A noncompetitive inhibitor binds to a site that is different from the active site. This site is called an allosteric site.
If we look at the experiment described in the question, the reaction rate decreases upon addition of the inhibitor. This effect is reversed by adding a large quantity of substrate.
The implication of this observation is that the enzyme and the inhibitor compete for the active site on the substrate.
Hence the inhibitor is a competitive inhibitor.
