Answer:
Credited
Explanation:
Equity Account <em>increase</em> on the credit side and <em>decrease </em>on the debit side.
So, when the account increased, we say it has been credited. This means further stock has been issued to new or existing owners.
Exit the roadway. Hope this helps!
A firm in a perfectly competitive market: d. must take the price that is determined in the market.
<h3>What is a
perfectly competitive market?</h3>
A perfectly competitive market can be defined as a type of market in which there are many buyers and sellers of homogeneous products, and there is free entry and exit in the market.
This ultimately implies that, all business firms in a perfectly competitive market must be willing to take the price that is determined in the market.
Read more on price here: brainly.com/question/11898489
#SPJ1
Answer:
A) incumbent firms are slow to change.
Explanation:
This business model type is said to be low cost and also can be seen and tested to be highly accessible to buyers and others goods in the market. Disruptive innovation is a business model that deals with the introduction of a new product or service into a market, at a lower cost and affordable that other products or its competitors, hereby luring prospective or buyers to buying the new product; displacing the leaders or top performers in the market. Disruptive innovation is highly favoured because the incumbent firms are slow to change.
International business research is only beginning to develop theory and evidence highlighting the importance of supranational regional institutions to explain firm internationalization. In this context, we offer new theory and evidence regarding the effect of a region's "institutional complexity" on foreign direct investment decisions by multinational enterprises (MNEs). We define a region's institutional complexity using two components, regional institutional diversity and number of countries. We explore the unique relationships of both components with MNEs' decisions to internationalize into countries within the region. Drawing on semiglobalization and regionalization research and institutional theory, we posit an inverted U-shaped relationship between a region's institutional diversity and MNE internationalization: extremely low or high regional institutional diversity has negative effects on internationalization, but moderate diversity has a positive effect on internationalization. Larger numbers of countries within the region reduces MNE internationalization in a linear fashion. We find support for these predicted relationships in multilevel analyses of 698 Japanese MNEs operating in 49 countries within 9 regions. Regional institutional complexity is both a challenge and an opportunity for MNEs seeking advantages through the aggregation and arbitrage of individual country factors.
