Answer:
$4,174
Explanation:
The computation of the cash flow to creditors is shown below:
= Interest expense paid - Addition contributed to a long term loan + Long term loan repaid
= $3,190 - $7,930 + $ 8,914
= $4,174
We simply deduct the additions contributed to a long term and added the long term loan repaid to the interest expense paid
Answer:
d. $1,876,306.49
Explanation:
As for the provided information,
Total funds needed at end of 4.5 years = $2.2 million
For this current savings are to be invested on a compound interest, where the rate of interest = 3.6%
Compounding period = Annually.
Therefore, future value factor of $1 after 4.5 years @ 3.6% = 1.1726997
The value of $2.2 million as on date = 
= $1,876,306.49
Therefore, the correct answer is
Option d.
The model that best fits the given situation is exponential
<h3>
what is an Exponential Function?</h3>
Exponential function, in mathematics a relationship of the form y = 
, where the independent variable x extends over the entire real number line as an exponent of a positive number a. The most important exponential function is y = 
.
Here,
The value of a classic car = $50,000
It is increasing in value by 5% per year.
So, here we have a = 50,000 and x = 5%
The function is increasing.
b = 1+5%
b = 1+0.05 = 1.05
Hence, the function that describes this situation is given by:
To learn more about Exponential Function from the given link
brainly.com/question/10750625
#SPJ4
Answer:
Sell their products at lower net prices abroad than in the domestic market
Explanation:
Variable costing is a product costing method where only the variable manufacturing cost like the cost of direct materials ,labor and the variable manufacturing overhead are factored into the cost of production. This does not consider a complete cost like the absorption method of costing and as a result , the final overall cost is lower,
Using variable cost males it possible to sell products at lower net prices abroad compared to the domestics market as the tax laws of various country requires absorption method , hence it is not captures using variable costing.
Answer:
d. Hexagon Inc. cannot be challenged in a court even when it fails to follow up on its promises.
