The answer would be a subjective process. Skinner asserts
the results of introspection are subjective and cannot be
confirmed for the reason that only noticeable behavior can be accurately
measured. Wundt focused on three areas of mental functioning; thoughts, images
and feelings.
Answer:
Either criminal law or civil law
Explanation:
The United States has two laws. Criminal law and civil law. Criminal law deals with the offender who construed the offense against the public, the society, and the state. It is also a recorded immediate victim who is a human being. These can be murder, hit and run, assault, rap-e, etc.
The civil law deals with the offenses against the private property or cooperation and injury to a human being. These laws differ in how the cases are to be seen. How the case is initiated and define. What type of punishment and penalty are to be given to the criminal. What type of protection is available for the defender.
I believe the answer would be B, as the listed names are those of their city-states.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
The First Continental Congress was a body of representatives elected by the legislative bodies of the American colonies of Great Britain in 1774, except Georgia. It met briefly and appointed its successor, the Second Continental Congress, which organized Americans in the war against the metropolis.
On September 5, 1774, representatives of the colony assemblies met in Philadelphia. The dilemma facing Congress was not simple because it had to show firmness before the English Government and, in turn, it had to curb the independence desires of the Sons of Liberty, which alarmed the conservative sectors more likely to reach an agreement with the Crown.
Congress passed a Declaration of Rights and Grievances addressed to the people of Britain and the colonies, and also passed a petition to the king. Both documents recognized Parliament's right to regulate foreign trade but defended the right of the colonies to run their own internal affairs without intervention by the imperial government.
This decision did not please the more radical groups, who argued that Parliament had no right over the colonies, that the colonists should love and honor the king, support him in wars and respect the international treaties he signed, and that the colonies should be governed through their assemblies. This doctrine was not going to be accepted by the British Government, as accepting it meant the end of the colonial relationship.
source: Larousse Encyclopaedia.
