All categories

2 years ago

What did the Indians do before horses?

Social Studies

2 answers:

Elena L [17]2 years ago

5 0

Answer:

they hunted bison and other wild animals like big game and trade.

Explanation:

Ilia_Sergeevich [38]2 years ago

5 0

Men grew tobacco and hunted bison, elk, deer, and other game; whole communities would also participate in driving herds of big game over cliffs. Fish, fowl, and small game were also eaten. Until the horse the only domesticated animals were dogs; these were sometimes eaten but were mostly used as draft animals.

You might be interested in

Ten-year-old Janelle is sad. She is crying. Her older brother looks at her and then continues watching television. He may be sho

sveticcg [70]

Answer: unawareness, he doesn't care.

Explanation: Instead of helping her, he just lets her sit on the floor and he acts as if he doesn't notice.

3 0

2 years ago

What is one example of a bill? A. A declaration of war that has just been issued by both houses of Congress B. A simple resoluti

sergeinik [125]

Answer:

D. A proposed law being considered by the Senate Committee on Commerce

Explanation:

A bill is a law that hasn't been signed and made official yet.

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Scenario : You have recently joined a firm which has more than 500 employees working at the moment. Since you are new to the env

GalinKa [24]

Answer:

fire them all

Explanation:

best choice

8 0

2 years ago

A group of 7- to 10-year-old children are playing organized little league baseball. they have learned the formal rules of the ga

Ronch [10]

Piaget would say that the group in which 7- to 10-year-old children are playing organized little league baseball and they have learned the formal rules of the game, and they play according to their shared knowledge is an example of heteronomous morality. In this stage children accept that all rules are made by some authority figure and their morality is imposed from the outside.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Dr. Daniela Yeung, a health psychologist, has been conducting a federally funded ethnographic study of couples in which the male

Anon25 [30]

Answer:

1) This situation is out of the standard set by Tarasoff decision’s duty to protect because the situation is severe and Dr. Yeung should not rely on probability. This could be possible that Aiden was trying to threaten Dr. Yeung and demanding no interference in his personal life. Dr. Yeung is a health psychologist but as a psychologist, she could understand the seriousness of the situation so she must call the professional support. Dr. Yeung should refer this case to the clinical psychologist and provide support to them about the health and behavior conditions.

2) Ethically, Dr. Yeung’s decision may affect the research purpose but morally her decision may help a person who needs it. The decision of Dr. Yeung was exceptional so it must be considered as an exceptional condition.

3) Dr. Yeung should consult the clinical psychologist and psychiatrists before handling this type of case. Dr. Yeung was not assigned to handle abnormal behavior problems and therapies, she could have handled the situation as an exceptional condition and with the help of team support.

4) Dr. Yeung should consider this case as health and abnormal behavior problem rather than a general condition. The behavior of Aiden was destructive and it should be analyzed with the help of security agencies, medical practitioner, psychologist and psychiatric. Dr. Yeung tried to done her job well but her lack of experience could have threaten her and patient’s life. I think, Dr. Yeung should demand professional help and experienced services.

3 0

3 years ago