If the Federal Government were able to regulate commerce within a state, there would possibly be a <u>clash of interests</u>.
<h3>
Trade within a
State</h3>
The United States was formed in such a way that there was an internal state government and a federal government that could implement general policies of common application.
Since the federal government has a different view of trade than the state does, an inclusion of the federal government would cause a <u>clash of interests</u> due to the different views among them.
If you want to learn more about Federal Government, you can visit the following link: brainly.com/question/371257
Congress would most likely rely on the following:
The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution declares the laws of the Constitution as supreme over state laws. In the case of conflict, federal law takes precedence over state laws and state constitutions. This cqn be found in Article 6, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution.
States would most likely rely on:
The nullification theory allowing states to nullify federal laws they find as unconstitutional, or interposition the right of a state to interpose between the states citizens and the federal government.
Answer:
age cohort
Explanation:
The term that is being described in this question is known as an age cohort. To put it in other words this term refers to a group of individuals that were born around the same time period and are from a particular population that has typically shared certain events and experiences over the course of their lives. These events and experiences may be world events that happened during that time period of localized events due to being part of the same population.
No
It caused Humiliation to his people distrust this caused an uprise.
