Answer: there will be too much pollution
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that government officials have set an emissions tax to reduce pollution and that the optimal tax should have been $1,500 but government officials have set the tax equal to $500.
It should be noted that due to the fact that the optimal tax has been set below the equilibrium, this will lead to a rise in pollution as the people will be aware that they're paying less than the optimal level which will lead to more pollution. An increase in the optimal tax will have help in reducing the pollution.
Answer:contact the psychiatrist for initiation of commitment proceedings.
Explanation:
This proceeding may legally order a person to receive psychiatric treatment at the hospital because the person is seen to may be danger to themselves and suspected that they may commit harm against their own body.
Some people may refuse treatment because they don't feel like they need the treatment and believe there is nothing wrong with them hence an initiation of commitment proceeding may be crucial to give them the help that they actually need.
A person who says they wish to end it all may end up taking their own lives if they are not admitted to a psychitric treatment.
I think it is C.Money a company shares with stockholders.
Answer:
The answer is expectancy.
Explanation:
Expectancy theory is a concept developed by Victor H. Vroom in 1964, where he postulated, that the strength an individual has in terms of his or her motivation to do an action, would appear when three components are satisfied to a certain value: expectancy, instrumentality, and valence. The question above is relevant to the expectancy component, which is detailed as the belief that an individual has regarding their efforts would result in the individual choosing to perform an action. In the case of Martha, she wasn’t sure that her efforts in trying to win the contract would lead to her 10% raise (outcome, a component of instrumentality), and thus, she decided not to try.
The answer is no more than minimal risk and the research activities fall within regulatory categories identified as eligible. In addition, an expedited review procedure contains a review of research connecting human subjects by the Institutional Review Board chairperson or by one or more experienced reviewers chosen by the chairperson from between members of the Institutional Review Board in agreement with the requirements set onwards in 45 CFR 46.110. The expedited review process is conducted at an Institutional Review Board expedited review session. The submission goes through by staff in discussion with the Chair as needed, to govern if an expedited review process may be directed. If the procedure encounters the regulatory standards for an expedited review, it will be sent to the expedited review conference.
