All categories

3 years ago

In mathematics what is 1 plus 1

Mathematics

2 answers:

Anna35 [415]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:this is a funny queston but the answer is 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Sergio039 [100]3 years ago

4 0

I believe the answer is 2

You might be interested in

One side of a triangle is one-fourth the longest side. The third side is 8 feet less than the longest side. The perimeter is 73.

Agata [3.3K]

Answer:

b/4 +b + b-8 =73

2b + b/4 = 81

9b/4 = 81

9b =81 * 4

b = 9* 4

b = 36

The sides of the triangles are 9 inch, 28 inch and 36 inch respectively

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Which of these statements is true about the number shown? 78409

m_a_m_a [10]

What are the statements. Give me that information and I will help answer.

5 0

3 years ago

What is 0.5, 3/16, 0.75, and 5/45 from least to greatest

BartSMP [9]

5/45, 3/16, 0.5, & 0.75

8 0

3 years ago

Find the linear equation with slope = 7 and y-intercept = -4 NEED HELP!!!

riadik2000 [5.3K]

You already have all you need. Just put in it the slope-intercept form: y=mx+b where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept so

y=7x-4

8 0

4 years ago

A nationwide sample of influential Republicans and Democrats was asked as a part of a comprehensive survey whether they favored

pickupchik [31]

Answer:

We conclude that there is an equal or larger proportion of Republicans in favor of lowering the standards.

Step-by-step explanation:

The complete question is: A nationwide sample of influential Republicans and Democrats was asked as a part of a comprehensive survey whether they favored lowering environmental standards so that high-sulfur coal could be burned in coal-fired power plants. The results were:

Number sampled: 1,000 (republican) , 800 (democrats)

Number in favor: 200 (republican) , 168 (democrats)

At the 0.02 level of significance, can we conclude that there is a larger proportion of Democrats in favor of lowering the standards? Determine the p-value.

Let $p_1$ = proportion of Republicans in favor of lowering the standards.

$p_2$ = proportion of Democrats in favor of lowering the standards.

SO, Null Hypothesis, $H_0$ : $p_1 \geq p_2$ {means that there is an equal or larger proportion of Republicans in favor of lowering the standards}

Alternate Hypothesis, $H_A$ : $p_1 < p_2$ {means that there is a larger proportion of Democrats in favor of lowering the standards}

The test statistics that would be used here Two-sample z-test for proportions;

T.S. = $\frac{(\hat p_1-\hat p_2)-(p_1-p_2)}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1)}{n_1}+\frac{\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2)}{n_2} } }$ ~ N(0,1)

where, $\hat p_1$ = sample proportion of Republicans in favor of lowering the standards = $\frac{200}{1000}$ = 0.20

$\hat p_2$ = sample proportion of Democrats in favor of lowering the standards = $\frac{168}{800}$ = 0.21

$n_1$ = sample of Republicans = 1000

$n_2$ = sample of Democrats = 800

So, the test statistics = $\frac{(0.20-0.21)-(0)}{\sqrt{\frac{0.20(1-0.20)}{1000}+\frac{0.21(1-0.21)}{800} } }$

= -0.52

The value of z test statistics is -0.52.

Now, P-value of the test statistics is given by the following formula;

P-value = P(Z < -0.52) = 1 - P(Z $\leq$ 0.52)

= 1 - 0.6985 = 0.3015

Now, at 0.02 significance level, the z table gives a critical value of -2.054 for left-tailed test.

Since our test statistic is more than the critical value of z as -0.52 > -2.054, so we have insufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will not fall in the rejection region due to which we fail to reject our null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that there is an equal or larger proportion of Republicans in favor of lowering the standards.

7 0

3 years ago