Answer:
C. The Cassies will win.
Explanation:
In the given case, the cassies would win as this was appraisal fraud that done by the company employee who is a Bank of america Subsidiary. Here the loan broker and the appraiser increase the fair market value of cassies home i.e. $620,000 but it would be lesser that is $250,000. So this inflate the value in order to make the payment of high rate with related to the mortgage
When a product is scarce, consumers are faced with conducting their own cost-benefit analysis; a product in high demand but low supply will likely be expensive. ... This means that a consumer should only purchase the product if they see a greater benefit from having the product than the cost associated with obtaining it.
Answer:
A. = (15% X $2M) + (21% X $2M) = $720,000. Since there is no mechanism for mitigating double taxation, the branch profit will be taxed on the to tax rate of 15% and 21% which is $300,000 and $420,000.
B. The total tax for $2m branch profit if US corporations can remove foreign based profit from US taxation will be just the 15% x $2m = $300,000.
C.If they are allowed to take deductions for foreign income taxes, the total tax on the $2m branch profit will be (21% -15%) x $2m = $120,000.
Explanation:
D.1. If credit are allowed for foreign income tax paid, total tax will be ($2m - $300,000 been foreign tax paid) x 21% = $357,000
D.2.
If the charge foreign income taxes at 30% and US corporations can claim refundable credit for foreign income tax paid on foreign source income = ($2m - $300,000 been the foreign income tax paid) = $1 700,000 x 30% = $510,000
For every jar Neha buys, she spends $0.95, and buying 9 jars in total, she pays $8.55 in total.
$0.95 x 9 jars = $8.55
For every jar Neha buys, she spends $0.95, and buying 9 jars in total, she pays $8.55 in total.
Learn more about cost here brainly.com/question/14358130
#SPJ1.
