By inference, the way in which Zaroff is portrayed as Rainsford’s foil is that: "Zaroff is a person without a conscience, but Rainsford has one." (Option B)
<h3>What is the explanation for the above inference?</h3>
As evidenced by the excerpt, Zaroff is not opposed to murdering others, which he regards as a form of hunting.
He has no regard for human life and is unconcerned whether they live or die, which distinguishes his character from Rainsford's.
Learn more about inference at;
brainly.com/question/25913650
#SPJ1
The answer is a hope this helps
Answer:
b
Explanation:
not 100 percent sure but should be bbb
Simple, put the research source in your own words. For example, I were to put your question in my own words I would do this: How can I use researched information without quoting it word for word?
Answer:
It produces shivers down the spine, or a feeling of unease.
Explanation:
The narrator hasn't said anything in this excerpt that makes them hard to believe, or unreliable. This excerpt is not particularly optimistic either. There is no blood and gore, but the narrator is clearly made uncomfortable by the painting. So the excerpt produces shivers down the spine, or a feeling of unease.
