Answer:
It will capitalize 245,000 to recognize the patent intangible asset
Explanation:
It will capitalize the entire research adn development cost as well as the fees and registration cost as are part of the incurred cost needed to obtain the patent
Therefore: 204,000 + 41,000 = 245,000
Answer: products are standardized or homogeneous
Explanation:
Products are standardized or homogeneous for the perfectly competitive market as, in the case of the competitive industry there are no barriers in the industry to entry. The products are homogeneous in the nature and there is large numbers of the firms are perfectly substituted in the industry. So, the price elasticity of the demand for the firm product is infinite.
Answer:
The answer is b) people who have a more inelastic demand for amusement parks.
Explanation:
For this price discrimination strategy, amusement parks are aiming at people who are more willing to come to the amusement park to spend more hours at the park and does not care about entry price as much as other people who are not normally willing to visit the park; instead, may be take a try for one or two hours at the end of the day at deep discounted price.
So, high price will be charged to people less care about entry price, in other works their demand for the amusement parks is relatively more inelastic to other people.
Thus, b is the right choice.
Answer: D. Longhorn owns the inventory and should report it on its balance sheet.
Explanation:
Goods to be sold on consignment for a company means a company is selling goods for another company and will be paid for their services.
In that case, the company being sold for will retain the ownership of the goods because the company that is selling it for them is simply providing a service.
Angus in this scenario are simply holding the goods to sell it and so do not own the goods. Longhorn should therefore record it in their own books as inventory.
Answer: price leadership
Explanation: Price leadership is a circumstance where one business, typically the dominant one in its market, sets prices that its rivals follow closely.
This business is typically the one with the minimum cost of production, thus being able to outperform the prices charged by any rival who tries to set their prices below the price range of the market leader.
Rivals could increase prices than the cost leader, but this would likely lead to lower share of the market unless rivals were able to distinguish their goods adequately.
Hence from the above we can conclude that the given case depicts price leadership strategy.
