Answer:
B. extortion.
Explanation:
In the context of law, extortion is defined as a criminal offence where an offender/criminal obtains something, particularly money or property, through force or violent threats.
If we look into the above scenario, the two criminals have committed a series of offences, however, they did not force nor threat the client to invest his money into their scheme. Therefore, they cannot be charged with extortion by the court.
Instead they would be charged with criminal conspiracy for scheming a fraud, money laundering for transfering the money into their family business to conceal income and deceit for deceiving the man with lies.
Answer:
there are many reasons to it one of it maybe the fact or incident of the real event is too disturbing so they modified it so young ones don't get terrified or it can be the exact opposite like the real event may not be very fascinating so they add up a little to catch readers attention.
C i think You have to look more into it though
Answer:
The appointed judge does not run against an opponent.
Explanation:
A retention election is a type of election or voting process for the judges in practice. It is also known as judicial retention. It is a process which takes place at regular intervals where a judge in practice is subjected to a referendum whereby the voters are asked to vote whether the judge should continue for a second term or should be removed form the office.
In such processes, the judges loses very rarely because in this election process, the incumbent judge does have any opponent to contest against. It is the will of voters to decide whether a judge will continue the office or not.
