Answer:
• The Empire united Sikhs, Hindus, and Muslims in one culture
Answer:
That argument is an example of a falacy masquerading as a valid inference.
Explanation:
Fallacy means error, deception or falsehood. Usually a fallacy is a misconception that is conveyed as true, misleading others. On the other hand, when an argument conveying a true idea is used to derive a false conclusion from false assumptions, the inference is valid.
Based on this, we can conclude that the argument quoted in the above question is a fallacy disguised as valid inference, because the speaker of the argument provides the information as a true statement, but it is wrong to draw conclusions about how Anthony will react after his accident, based on how other people reacted.
Answer:
<em>Yes, I foresee the problem of inability to process emotional issues caused by lack of dreaming.</em>
<em></em>
Explanation:
Dreams are thought to occur during the REM (rapid Eye Movement) sleep, but can also occur in all stages of sleep. During this REM sleep that occurs at intervals during the night, characterized by rapid eye movements, more dreaming and bodily movement, and faster pulse and breathing,<em> there is an absence of anxiety-triggering molecule noradrenaline in our brain. Also, we experience atonia, which is believed to occur to keep us from acting out our dreams</em>. During this REM sleep, research has shown that key emotional and memory-related parts of the brain are reactivated as we dream. <em>This means that emotional memory reactivation is occurring in a brain free of a key stress chemical, which allows us to re-process upsetting memories in a safer, calmer environment.</em>
We can infer from the statements above that, the elimination of dreaming by the drug might result in memory reactivation in an otherwise stressed brain. This might lead to memory fuzziness, inability to concentrate, and most importantly, inability to process emotional issues. This might eventually not be worth the 25 years saved by eliminating sleep.
Answer:
thanks for the warning and yes their are many kids in this app that shouldn't see that I'm one of them these people are disgusting
Answer:
Competent person.
Explanation:
As the exercise says, a competent person is one who is capable of identifying existing and predictable hazards in the surroundings, as well as unsanitary or dangerous to employees, and who has authorization to take prompt corrective measures to eliminate them.
=