Per capita GDP is GDP divided by total population.
<h3>What is a Per capita GDP?</h3>
This refers to an economic tool that measures the total output of a country by taking a gross domestic product and divides it by number of people.
Hence, the Per capita GDP is derived by calculating the GDP divided by total population.
Therefore, the Option E is correct.
Read more about Per capita GDP
<em>brainly.com/question/18414212</em>
#SPJ12
Answer:
C because Perishability is used in marketing to describe the way in which service cannot be stored for sale in the future
Answer: d. All of the Above
Explanation:
All the above senior managers are more likely to apply more Domestic HRM practices to make them International HRM practices when they are put into a situation where International practices will be needed.
This is because they have been with the Domestic companies for much of their time and so know more about Domestic practices than international.
The first options refers to senior managers in firms with large domestic markets. To be a senior manager demands experience in the market they are in so it is not far fetched to say that they are more knowledgeable in domestic practices than international.
The second option speaks of managers with little International experience meaning they are more likely to engage in transferability between domestic and International practices.
The third option speaks of managers who built their careers on domestic experience. They will find it hard letting go of what has brought them such success so will more likely apply domestic practices on an international scale.
Answer:
a. licensor
Explanation:
The licensor is the person or company that have the rights on an idea, product, service, etc, and gives the licensee limited permission to market that. In this case, Vimonland Theme is a licensor because the company gives the rights to an investment company to operate a franchise.
Answer:
A. Decrease
Explanation:
In investment appraisal with the method of Net Present Value, the bone of contention and the central matter is the TIME VALUE OF MONEY.
In the above scenario, the initial working capital was 100% released in proportions of 40%, 40% and 20%, throughout the 3 years of the project. However, if the reverse had been the case, i.e. parting with more cash now and the requirement of working capital now becomes: Year 0 = -10,000, Year 1 = - 10,000, Year 2 = -10,000, Year 3 = +30,000; the NPV would definitely shrink because the value of 10,000 each in Years 0-2 would not be the same when it is recovered from the project in year 3. The value will be smaller and hence the NPV of the project would have decreased as a result of the time value of money.
