No because the exact opposite of -3 would be 3.
Answer:
A = 153.94 sq mi
Step-by-step explanation:
In this scenario, we would be starting from the center point and searching the area of a square since the distance in every direction would the same 7 mi. This 7-mile distance would be our radius in this scenario. We now need to use the formula for the Area of a circle to calculate the search area. This formula is the following
A = 
A = 
A = 
A = 153.94 sq mi
A total of 153.94 square miles must be searched.
Answer:
16. -197 < -110
17. 167 > -65
18. Mercury, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Uranus, Neptune
Step-by-step explanation:
It can help to plot these temperatures on a number line. The ones farther to the left are less than ones to their right.
__
16. -197 < -110 . . . Uranus < Jupiter
__
17. 167 > -65 . . . Mercury > Mars
__
18. Reading the graph from right to left, the order greatest to least is ...
Mercury, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Uranus, Neptune
Not surprisingly, this is the order of these planets outward from the sun.
These are the steps needed for this question hope this helps if there is any more questions do feel free to ask them
Answer:
For this case the value of r = -0.66
Now we can calculate the determination coeffcient:

And then we can conclude that 43.56% of the variation in y can be explained by the explanatory variable
And then 100-43.56 = 56.44 % of the variation in y that cannot be explained by the explanatory variable
Step-by-step explanation:
For this case we need to calculate the slope with the following formula:
Where:
And we can find the intercept using this:
And the model obtained for this case is:

The correlation coefficient is a "statistical measure that calculates the strength of the relationship between the relative movements of two variables". It's denoted by r and its always between -1 and 1.
And in order to calculate the correlation coefficient we can use this formula:
For this case the value of r = -0.66
Now we can calculate the determination coeffcient:

And then we can conclude that 43.56% of the variation in y can be explained by the explanatory variable
And then 100-43.56 = 56.44 % of the variation in y that cannot be explained by the explanatory variable