Answer:
1. the writer has limitations because they can only write about the chesapeake colonies and the new england colonies, not about anything else that doesn't tie in with those two colonies. the writer can make choices about how to answer the questions and how to word them to make them sound well written.
2. you will need to think about the historical causation, appropriate use of relevant historical evidence and more that are required by the prompt. without these you wont know how to answer the question. the essay must include the intro, body, and the conclusion to receive a full score.
3. option a would not be an acceptable thesis for the prompt. it is not an acceptable thesis because it doesn't give more detail about what you are talking about. your thesis should be specific, it should only cover what you will discuss in your paper. option a was not specific, so it could of talked about anything including those two colonies.
4. the new england colonies had thin rocky soil with fast moving rivers with a more diverse economy that included shipping luber, and exports of food and crops. the chesapeake colonies had better soil that the new england colonies,and a longer growing season. the chesapeake colonies had a much more higher priority on the production of tobacco and other cash crops. since they lived in different regions they had different production needs. they were both settled for religious freedom but they had their differences. both colonies did disturb the american indians by taking away their land to settle, which lead to conflict. i've met all of the requirements because i answered the question fully.
5. to provide evidence you must include facts about what you are writing about. they must be true to be considered evidence. you could also use sources to add information. this excerpt did a good job at using evidence. they used lots of facts regarding the two colonies. (not sure about this one)
6. you could provide historical context by first adding some background about what your going to add. then you could state your historical context that you are going to add, and then explain what you just added. you could add the historical context in the body paragraphs when trying to prove or solve something to the reader.
Explanation:
i hope this helps everyone. goodluck!!!
Answer: 0.790 g/cm3
Explanation:
The density of acetone is 790 Kg/m3.
To convert from Kg to g we multiply by 1000 (1 Kg = 1000 g)
To convert from m3 to cm3 we multiply by 10∧6
So, The density of acetone in (g/cm3) = (790 x 1000) / (10∧6) = 0.79 g/cm3
The CNS is comprised of the brain, cerebellum and spinal cord. Remaining neurons, and related cells, dispensed all through the physique form the PNS. The worried gadget has three extensive functions: sensory input, data processing, and motor output.
Answer and Explanation:
Notes: Slavery allows it to be so harmful that it changes even the most kind people, making them mean. Education empowers the oppressed. Education is a powerful weapon for blacks. Deprivation can be used as an incentive. Nobody liked to be called an oppressor, even though it was.
I decided to take notes on the most important themes exposed by Douglass. These themes were discovered by reading chapter 6 and by interpreting why Douglass decided to include these moments of his life in his narrative.
The first theme that I noticed is that slavery was widespread and prejudicial to everyone, even for the arms. Slavery placed cruelty in the hearts of white people and made them lose their kindness and kindness by becoming cruel and unworthy. I also noticed that white people were very afraid to allow blacks to have access to education. This is because education allowed the critical thinking that would give blacks the power to fight against the system that oppressed them.
Douglass was deprived of studying, but this deprivation motivated him to strive and receive an education that would make big differences in his life. Last but not least, we can see that the whites knew that the violence of slavery was incorrect, since they did not want them to know that they were extremely violent and oppressive to the slaves they owned.
The author uses several rhetorical strategies that range from personal statements, which increase our empathy for him, to logical and correct statements that show us how that whole slave system worked and how it was manipulated to last. This all causes an extension of what we know about slavery.
