Answer:
A change in the real money supply can result either from change in the nominal money supply through Federal Reserve policy ( holding the price level constant) or from a change in the price level( holding the nominal money supply constant).The change in the nominal money supply causes a shift of the aggregate demand curve, whereas a change in the price level causes a movement along the aggregate demand curve.
Explanation:
In classical conditioning, the Neutral Stimulus (NS) becomes a Conditioned Stimulus (CS) after it reliably signals the impending occurrence of the Unconditioned Stimulus (US).
The conditioned stimulus (CS) is a neutral stimulus (NS) that - after being repeatedly presented before the unconditioned stimulus - evokes a similar response as the unconditioned stimulus (US).
For example, a cat staring at a can of food (unconditioned stimulus) reacts differently to the sound of a can opener being struck on any surface (neutral stimulus). But if you condition a cat to believe that striking a can opener on any surface signals it will eat a can of food, the neutral stimulus becomes the conditioned stimulus.
Learn the difference between classical and operant conditioning here: brainly.com/question/17583598
#SPJ4
$1,333 - $1,200 = $133
Your gain was: $133
Answer:
$50 billion
Explanation:
To find the change in aggregate expenditures, we need to find the change in consumption. For this, we will use the marginal propensity to consume formula:
MPC = ΔC/ΔY
Where:
MPC = Marginal propensity to consume
ΔC = Change in consumption
ΔY = Change in output (GDP)
We know that out MPC is 0.5, and our ΔY is $billion. We plug these amounts into the formula:
0.5 = ΔC / 100 billion
And we rearrange the equation to solve for ΔC
ΔC = $ 100 billion x 0.5
ΔC = $50 billion
So the change in consumption is $50 billion, which is also the change in aggregate expenditure.
Answer:
<u><em>The correct answer is:</em></u> deliver the bad news at the end of the message.
Explanation:
Presenting negative news is always challenging. That is why it is necessary that before presenting a negative news the ideal approach is chosen according to the public, the approach can be direct or indirect, in the direct approach, the problem is presented in a more objective way, and in the indirect approach some resources to cushion negative news and not have such a negative impact on the public.
The ideal approach depends on the analysis that will analyze the public's receptivity to the message. <u>Therefore, when choosing the direct approach, it is necessary to avoid delivering bad news at the end of the message, as this can be viewed negatively and not objectively by the public.
</u>
There needs to be an explanation of the reasons for the negative message, which ensures greater objective understanding of the facts and understanding.
