Answer:
D. The tax cut can be categorized as fiscal policy and the lowering of interest rates can be categorized as monetary policy.
Explanation:
Fiscal policy is when the government uses either taxes or government spending to influence the economy.
Contractionary fiscal policy is when the government increases taxes or reduces spending.
Expansionary fiscal policy is when the government decreases taxes or increases spending.
Monetary policy are policies enacted by central bank of a country to control money supply or interest rest.
Contractionary monetary policy is reducing money supply or increasing interest rates.
Expansionary monetary policy is increasing money supply or decreasing interest rate.
I hope my answer helps you.
Answer:
Cognitive reappraisal
Explanation:
In simple words, The term "cognitive reappraisal" relates to a flexible regulation technique that uses cognitive control and executive functioning to reinterpret inputs or events in the surrounding in order to alter their interpretation as well as psychological connotation.
Thus, from the above we can conclude that the correct answer is cognitive reappraisal.
Answer:
Here:
Explanation:
Purchase price of shares = 24000
total purchase cost = price of shares bought + broker fees total purchase cost = 24000 + 0.01*24000 =24240
selling price of shares = 29100
total selling cost = price of shares sold - broker fees total selling cost = 29100 - 35 = 29065
Net proceeeds = total selling cost - total purchase cost Net proceeds = 29065 - 24240 = 4825
Answer:
According to the Ohio state studies , we can say that the Adrian as leader is high in initiating structure.
Explanation:
Initiating structure can be defined as the particular degree to which a leader would define his or her role and also specify and organize the role of employees too, in order to achieve the organizations goals.
Adrian is also doing the same thing here, as she has given a lot of time in assigning employees their particular tasks and scheduling their work , in such a way that goals are achieved.
Answer:
No.
Explanation:
The market should determine the price of goods and services only. The commercialization of human organs would increase the existing social inequality. This is because poor people would only be able to sell their organs, meaning they would not have the ability to buy a kidney if they needed it. On the other hand, it would increase the sale of kidneys for material survival itself, which is morally reprehensible.
