Y = $12,752,000,000,000 + $201,645,000,000 = 12,953,645,000,000 x = $12,752,000,000,000 r = ?n = 2010 - 2009y = x(r + 1)ⁿ 12,953,645,000,000 = 12,752,000,000,000 * (r + 1)¹ 12,953,645,000,000 ÷ 12,752,000,000,000 = (r + 1)¹ 1.016 = r + 1 r = 1.016 - 1 r = 0.016 y = $12,752,000,000,000 (since it is in 2009, this is future value) x = ? (initial value in 2007 r = 0.016 n = 2009 - 2007 = 2
y = x(r + 1)ⁿ 12,752,000,000,000 = x(0.016 + 1)² 12,752,000,000,000 = x(1.016)² 12,752,000,000,000 = x * 1.032 x = 12,752,000,000,000 ÷ 1.032 x = 12,356,589,147,287 the answer
According to my research on different government powers, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this is the definition of Police Power. Like mentioned in the question this is the ability that states have to regulate it's citizens behaviors and maintain order, for the health, safety, and general welfare of those citizens.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
<u>Answer:</u> Option 1 After income from continuing operations.
<u>Explanation:</u>
A disposal account shows the profit or loss from the sale of any asset. When the sale price is higher than the book value of the component then it is a gain. When the sale price is less than book value then it is a loss.
Loss from the sale of component will reduce the income of the business. When there is a loss it is debited in the income statement. This appears below the operations income and it is deducted from the revenue to show the actual value of the revenue.
The $60,000 paid as last month's rent will be reported as an asset, prepaid rent, and the deposit of $80,000 will be reported as an asset, deposits. The new walls and offices costing $360,000 will be capitalized as leasehold improvements and amortized over the 5-year term of the lease. Amortization will be $72,000 per year or $6,000 per month. As a result, Tell will report expenses in 20X0 of $60,000 in rent and $6,000 in amortization for a total of $66,000.
Countries with more independent central banks have lower inflation rates, but these have come at the expense of greater output fluctuations is a false statement as we know that, an independent Central Bank could have higher credibility. If somebody has a higher conviction in the Central Bank, this accommodates to subdue inflationary expectations. Indeed, this causes inflation more accessible to keep lowering.
