This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.
The excerpt below is from a speech given by President Theodore Roosevelt in 1908.
To permit every lawless capitalist, every law-defying corporation, to take any action, no matter how iniquitous, in the effort to secure an improper profit and to build up privilege, would be ruinous to the Republic and would mark the abandonment of the effort to secure in the industrial world the spirit of democratic fair dealing.
How did President Roosevelt deal with the problem described above?
He proposed federal legislation abolishing corporations.
He refused to enforce patents and copyrights.
He arrested business leaders for unfair practices.
He filed lawsuits to break up "bad trusts."
Answer: He filed lawsuits to break up "bad trusts."
Explanation:
Roosevelt applied what became known as the “Square Deal,” an economic reformation directed to the conservation of natural resources, better control over corporations, and protecting the general consumer. His firm antitrust approach, filing over 40 suits against monopolies, gain him the nickname of the “Trust Buster.”
I believe the answer is: Gaining control of Paris and forcing a change in the monarchy.
The revolutionaries planned to do this by eliminating Charles X , (who succeeded king louis after he was executed by his own people) . Eliminating Charles X from the government marked the end of monarch system in France, and changed it to popular sovereignty. Leaders of france was elected through democratic election after this event.
Answer:
The modern Democratic Party supports a capitalist economy, with an emphasis on equal human rights, environmental conservation, and heavier taxes for public programs for the people and communities of the United States.
<span>Under current economic models, corporations are globalized, You can communicate with someone in China as if you're talking to your next door neighbor. If the US were to remain isolated from other nations, it would negatively impact trade that has become a part of our daily lives - for everything from rice to oil to silicon. Trade is what drives economies and policy. To maintain and improve quality of life, which, in my opinion, should be the goal of any civilization, it must take into account globalization. To not follow this policy would make life as we know it extremely difficult to sustain. At the same time, necessity is the mother of invention. If we shut out ourselves from fellow civilizations, we may soon discover a new energy source; but we can look at one current example of a country that has shut out all other countries - North Korea. I don't know if the citizens are truly happy there, I assume not, from what I've heard of the people who try to escape, and it seems that not allowing your citizens basic medical needs which are available everywhere else in the world, but instead you let them suffer (National Geographic has a documentary on one such topic), this seems completely inhumane.
At any rate, this is not a black and white issue, there are many pieces to the puzzle that must be addressed to let us know if this policy would be beneficial to the citizens of the country. Many policies need to be put into place and maky problems must be solved in order to maintain a happy population.</span>
This can depend on what way the person wants to be successful. if they want to be more successful with their happiness, then a lot of money could support happiness or create discontent. If a person wanted a marriage to be held together by his wealth, it can depend on how the money is used... for example, if a couple has no money or very little, then they can get into fights caused by stress... and if a couple has a lot of money, then they could also get into fights because of greed. It really all depends on the users and possessors of the cash.
I hope this answered your question effectively enough.
