Nate finds the language of the contract to buy bedroom furniture difficult to understand due to "procedural unconscionability".
<h3>What is 
procedural unconscionability?</h3>
Unconscionability that results from the contract-making process rather than from a contract's terms that are inherently unfair or unreasonable
Examples of Procedural Unconscionability is-
- influencing an underprivileged party who would not have otherwise signed the contract to do so. 
- minimising important clauses in contracts for the sake of the underdog. 
- If one side uses threats of violence against the other party, his family, or friends, this is known as coercion.
Therefore, Procedural unconscionability is based on elements that deprive a party of a meaningful choice, such as customer ignorance or a significant amount of unclear fine print.
To know more about elements required in contract-making, here
brainly.com/question/8116487
#SPJ4
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
PV= $1,311.17
Explanation:
Giving the following information: 
Future Value (FV)= $5,000
Number of periods (n)= 25 years
Interest rate (i)= 5.5% compounded annually
T<u>o calculate the present value (PV), we need to use the following formula:</u>
<u></u>
PV= FV / (1+i)^n
PV= 5,000 / 1.055^25
PV= $1,311.17
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
new politacal parties
Explanation:
im taking the test right now
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Annual demand (D) = 1,600 units
Ordering cost per order (Co) = $16
Holding cost per item per annum (H) = $8
EOQ = √2Dco
                 H
EOQ = √2 x 1,600 x $16
                     $8
EOQ = 80 units
Explanation:
EOQ is the square root of 2 multiplied by annual demand and ordering cost per order divided by holding cost per item per annum.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
Based on the information that was provided in the question, Pablo’s case with regards to the scenario given will be regarded as a civil case due to the fact that Drew is being sued. 
The Federal court will be the court where the case will hold. This is due to the fact that the parties involved are from different states. While Pablo is from New Mexico, Drew is from California. For speeding, a criminal case can also be brought against Drew.