Answer:
700 units
Explanation:
FC1 : Fixed Costs from process 1
VC1 : Variable cost per unit from process 1
FC2 : Fixed Costs from process 2
VC2 : Variable cost per unit from process 2
FC1 = $50,000
VC1 = $700 per unit
FC2 = $400,000
VC2 = $200 per unit
To calculate the break-even (quantity) point we must equate the TC1 (Total cost of process 1) to TC2 (Total cost of process 2)
TC1 = TC2
FC1 + VC1(y) = FC2 + VC2(y) where y is the break-even units
50,000 + 700y = 400,000 + 200y
500y = 350,000
y = 350,000 / 500
y = 700 Units
In a situation wherein Country Y has a progressive tax system for income, with no credits or deductions, a CEO earning $2.5 million per year would pay the most as a percentage of income in the country Y. Therefore, the option D holds true.
<h3>What is the significance of a progressive tax system?</h3>
A progressive tax system can be referred to or considered as a system wherein the percentage of tax to be levied increases with an increase in the total taxable income for an individual. The rates of taxation under this system are defined under percentage.
In the situation given above, when a CEO in country Y earns $2.5 million, i.e., more than any other person mentioned above, he will be the one who will have to pay the most taxes as a part of percentage of his income.
Therefore, the option D holds true and states regarding the significance of the progressive tax system.
Learn more about progressive tax system here:
brainly.com/question/12416177
#SPJ2
Answer:
Modified Rebuy.
Explanation:
Modified Rebuy can be defined as the desires of a buyer to re-purchase or reorder the products previously bought but with certain modifications either in prices, products, suppliers, or terms. The buyer may modify the current purchasing terms because he may not be satisfied with the supplier or may have some new requirements.
In the given case, the modification in supplier has been made by the organization to get a better price. Thus this is an example of modified rebuy.
So, the correct answer is modified rebuy.
<span>Three people share the profit and losses as follows.Total ratio is 100. Hendrick and Mitch each get 2/5 of the profit or suffer 2/5 of the loss i. e (40/100) as well while redding gets 1/5 i. e (20/100). Redding can contribute no more than one-fifth of the liqudated capital. The$20, 000 in excess liability will be distributed in proportion to their ratios. 2/5 * 20, 000 = $8, 000 each for Hendrick and Mitcherum while redding gets 1/5 * 20, 000 = $4000. If the non cash assest is sold Hendrick would receive 2/5 * 50, 000 = 100000/5 = $20, 000. The minmum hendrick would receive would be $20, 000 + $8, 000 = $28, 000</span>
<span>A calculator (answer C) is not way to access the electronic banking its kinda common sense</span>
